Rene — US JUSTICE CHIEF REFUSES TO CALL WATERBOARDING TORTURE
Topic(s): Torture | Comments Off on Rene — US JUSTICE CHIEF REFUSES TO CALL WATERBOARDING TORTUREUS JUSTICE CHIEF REFUSES TO CALL WATERBOARDING TORTURE
by Paul Handley
Agence France Presse
January 30, 2008
WASHINGTON (AFP) – US Attorney General Michael Mukasey refused
Wednesday to define waterboarding as illegal torture, even while
admitting that if he underwent the interrogation technique that he
would “feel” it is torture.
Fending off pressure in a Senate Justice Committee hearing to
categorically call waterboarding, which simulates drowning, as torture
under US law, the top US legal official suggested that under certain
conditions it could be legal, and said that learned people could
disagree on the issue.
“I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to pass definitive
judgement on the technique’s legality,” he said.
“There are some circumstances where current law would appear clearly
to prohibit waterboarding’s use. Other circumstances would present
a far closer question.”
In his first testimony to the committee since becoming attorney general
on November 9, Mukasey said that torture is illegal under US statutes,
but that waterboarding is not definitively covered by those statutes.
“There is a statute which says it is a relative issue,” Mukasey said
to questioning by Senator Joe Biden.
He also said that the Central Intelligence Agency does not now use
waterboarding and that the technique is “currently” not approved for
its interrogation program.
However, he declined to say whether it had been used in the past.
“I am not authorized to talk about what the CIA has done in the past,”
he told the Senate panel.
Senators were adamant that it is torture, with committee head Patrick
Leahy insisting that waterboarding “has been recognized as torture
for the last 500 years.”
“Would waterboarding be torture if it was done to you?” Senator Ted
Kennedy asked Mukasey.
“I would feel it was,” Mukasey said, while insisting that that does
not constitute a legal opinion.
“It’s like saying you are opposed to stealing but aren’t sure if bank
robbery would qualify,” Kennedy said.
The hearing renewed pressure on the administration of President George
W. Bush to categorically ban waterboarding and other interrogation
techniques as torture.
As Mukasey testified, seven women sat in the audience wearing orange
jumpsuits and black hoods resembling those of the US war on terror
prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and waved signs saying “I will not
be silent” and “No torture.”
Leahy said that the CIA has used the technique in the recent past,
an assertion implicitly confirmed by Deputy Secretary of State John
Negroponte, who was the US spy chief from 2005 to 2007, in a National
Journal interview Monday.
“We’ve taken steps to address the issue of interrogations, for
instance, and waterboarding has not been used in years,” Negroponte
told the magazine.
Mukasey insisted that, based on briefings he has received since he
became attorney general, that the CIA at the moment is not authorized
to use the method in its interrogations.
But he said he would not make a categorical statement on it because he
did not want to signal to US enemies what they would face in US hands.
“Any answer that I could give could have the effect of articulating
publicly and to our adversaries the limits and the contours of
generally worded laws that define the limits of a highly classified
interrogation program,” he said.
The issue was central to the committee’s hearings late last year on
Mukasey’s nomination to head the Justice Department.
At the time he declined to answer questions on it, saying he had
not been briefed on CIA practices or the Bush administration’s legal
reasonings.